On 5 Aug 2004 at 19:46, Jim Ley wrote: > I've never seen a persuasive use case for the splitting of form > elements outside their form containers Hallvord then wrote: > Disagree. It is very nice if you want the equivalent of severalforms in > a table, say one table row for each form. Since FORMisn't allowed to > appear mixed in with the table markup, the"form" attribute is a > reasonable solution. Document order is not necessarily visual flow or user-logical order. Consider: one form per table column, instead of per table row as mentioned above. HTML tables are row-centric, not column centric. Since we are not altering table behavior in any way with web forms 2, then allowing fields to dis-associate from form containers seems vital for a case like this. While we might want to open up some element's content models, it wouldn't solve all use cases. -Brian -- Brian Wilson Opera Core QAReceived on Saturday, 7 August 2004 18:22:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:36 UTC