- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 17:35:25 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Matthew Raymond wrote: > > 1) If you avoid the WF2 template model, it requires new two new tags, > not one, as you can see. The repeat attribute already exists in WF2, so > why not use it? Because the semantic of the repeat stuff is that, well, they repeat. It'd be like using a <blockquote> for something just because it's a block-level element, ignoring the fact that it indicates a quote. [I think I may already have convinced you of this, in which case, never mind! Just going through Web Apps comment from a while back, in chronological order.] -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 5 August 2004 10:35:25 UTC