- From: Ingar Mæhlum Arntzen <ingar.arntzen@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:49:01 +0100
- To: François Daoust <fd@w3.org>, public-webtiming@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 10 December 2015 09:49:31 UTC
Hi Francois and all. I'm working with the timing provider interface and the spec currently defines Object.Observe as the mechanism to monitor state changes of the timing provider (i.e. skew, vector). This post [1] though indicates that O.O does not have a particularly bright future. Do you know anything about this? Also, I'm not sure if there was a specific reason why O.O was suggested in the first place. For the first implementation (where both timing provider and timing object are user objects) I'm thinking that a basic callback mechanism should do. Would you agree? [1] http://www.infoq.com/news/2015/11/object-observe-withdrawn Ingar
Received on Thursday, 10 December 2015 09:49:31 UTC