- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 12:12:27 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, public-website-redesign@w3.org, Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>, Vivien Lacourba <vivien@w3.org>
Hi Gregg, Le 15/03/2021 à 18:14, Gregg Kellogg a écrit : > Giving the community the ability to edit and/or update tags and families > might be useful, and organizing based on common citations, or creating a > meta-family that is populated through such analysis could be useful. That's a great suggestion - having discussed this with Denis, we will look into making the two proposed classification schemeq of the TR redesign (spec families and tags) collaboratively maintained on github. This can hopefully also serve as a way to bootstrap concrete proposals in what classification to use as the default structure of the TR page. > That said, I’m really supportive if this effort, as /TR is otherwise > pretty opaque, and any effort at categorizing would be an improvement. > Perhaps tags might show up as a UI element of the different families > and/or related documents that could themselves be navigable. Note that the cards for each specs in the resign includes a list of tags that can be used to find tag-related specifications; this isn't applied at the family level, but I could imagine further iterations on the redesign could surface them if we get a consistent tagging model - which again, I hope the collaborative approach sketched above can help us achieve. Dom
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2021 11:12:32 UTC