- From: Kiyoshi Tanaka (田中 清) <tanaka.kiyoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 18:32:13 +0900
- To: public-websignage@w3.org
- Cc: Kiyoshi Tanaka <tanaka.kiyoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Dear all members, Though I've tried to fix the slot of the conference call, I've not been able to find the good slot, yet. I want to continue to seek the conference call slot, however, it must be proceeded the discussion. So, I want to start the discussion in this ML. The starting point was the e-mail[1] from DAS-WG replied to my proposal. We should answer to the DAS-WG regarding the following points. 1) Whether APIs are implemented securely within the default browser context. 2) The draft creation of Power Status Management, compared with the Battery Status API. 3) The Context Information's draft (device information) clarified such as on the fingerprinting issue and web-runtime. Before making a response, I want to know your opinion in the next following points. a) Our APIs are limited to the signage or extended to the embedded system including the signage. b) The browser that the APIs are implemented is the general browser or the specific browser such as for the signage. c) We continue to ask DAS-WG the standardization or not. In addition, the architecture and the security model should be considered more. So, let me hear regarding these issues. Anyway, please let us know how do you think about these points. Your opinion for even one point is also welcomed. [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-websignage/2017Oct/0001.html Best regards, Kiyoshi --- Kiyoshi Tanaka, Ph.D. NTT Service Evolution Laboratories mailto: tanaka.kiyoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp
Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2017 09:32:54 UTC