- From: Futomi Hatano <futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp>
- Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:48:55 +0900
- To: Sangwhan Moon <sangwhan@iki.fi>
- Cc: 김성혜 <shkim@etri.re.kr>, "public-websignage@w3.org" <public-websignage@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <20151017164852.B58A.17D6BAFB@newphoria.co.jp>
I re-planned the schedule of the day 1. https://www.w3.org/community/websignage/wiki/Group_meeting_at_TPAC_2015 We can discuss on "what's next" about 2.5 hours. Cheers, Futomi On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:22:14 +0900 Futomi Hatano <futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp> wrote: Hi Sangwhan, > > I don't understand why we should put some slots to the day 2. > What will we do on the day1? > > I think that most of attendees (including observers) have already planned their schedule. > We should not change the day at this time. > > I'd like to finish our meeting in a day on the day 1 if possible. > If we don't have enough time, we can extend the end time on the day 1. > The day 2 is just a backup. > > I think that we have enough time for now. > Sung Hei needs only 15mins. There is no impact at all. > I'd like to hear her presentation before we discuss "what's next". > Besides, I'd like to introduce our (Newphoria) experiences and issues before the slot "what's next". > > What do you worry about? > > Cheers, > Futomi > > > On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:39:51 +0900 > Sangwhan Moon <sangwhan@iki.fi> wrote: > >> (Top posting as it'll be impossible to follow otherwise) >> >> >> I'll have to discuss a bit with Hatano-san about this, but for now I think it might be better to allocate a separate slot >> for the profiles and standards. I would strongly prefer it being a open discussion rather than a one-way presentation >> though. >> >> >> Let me open up a straw poll and send it to the list. >> >> >>> On Oct 16, 2015, at 4:27 PM, 김성혜 <shkim@etri.re.kr> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> We were planning to make short presentation so we could not make that presentation (alone) to day 2. >>> It is OK with us if we are going to move several presentation together. >>> >>> - Sung Hei >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ 보낸 사람 : "Sangwhan Moon" <sangwhan@iki.fi> >>> 보낸 날짜 : 2015-10-16 15:57:29 ( +09:00 ) >>> 받는 사람 : 김성혜 <shkim@etri.re.kr> >>> 참조 : public-websignage@w3.org <public-websignage@w3.org> >>> 제목 : Re: Proposal of new requirements for the Web-based signage toward W3C standard >>> >>> >>>> On Oct 16, 2015, at 2:11 PM, 김성혜 <shkim@etri.re.kr> wrote: >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> >>>> ETRI would like to make short (10~15minutes) on the Emergency profile. >>>> The title is as follows: WDS Emergency profile : Status and future plan (ETRI) >>>> >>>> You can check the agenda at the following path. >>>> https://www.w3.org/community/websignage/wiki/Group_meeting_at_TPAC_2015 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I think it's better to allocate a separate slot for the profiles and specs. NTT brought up the power control specification, and I've heard the need of some other spec related topics. The 13:00 slot is probably better suited for discussing the overall group logistics. How about we push all of those into a track on day 2? The last day is a bit slow, but we can make use of the morning timeframe since there is more than one non-logistics topic that has been brought up. (Besides, most of our members are Japanese and Sapporo probably isn't magical enough to warrant going sightseeing in the afternoon. :-) ) Sangwhan
Received on Saturday, 17 October 2015 07:49:27 UTC