W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-websignage@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Web animations draft in SVG/CSS WG (was: Re: Gap analysis: SMIL

From: Satoru Takagi <sa-takagi@kddi.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:06:50 +0900
To: public-websignage@w3.org
Message-Id: <201301161506.IJH60461.UHBJBLBtT@kddi.com>
More information about Web Animations

Background and concepts are discribed in these pages
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/F2F/Sydney_2012/Agenda/Animations/WebAnimations
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/fx/wiki/Web_Animations

Note for Web Animations and CSS Integration
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/raw-file/tip/web-anim/css-integration.html

Regards,

Satoru

<50C2F26A.8000405@w3.org> の、
   "Web animations draft in SVG/CSS WG (was: Re: Gap analysis: SMIL" において、
   "Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>"さんは書きました:

> This looks like a new development quite relevant to this group, and the 
> ongoing discussion
> 
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/raw-file/tip/web-anim/index.html
> 
> Interesting comment thread starting at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2012OctDec/0055.html
> 
> On 12/7/2012 5:15 AM, Futomi Hatano wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 04:55:11 +0900
> > Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> >> For example, as I mentioned at the Web-based Signage Workshop in June
> >> [1], even SCXML could be another "related existing standard" here.
> >>
> >> Also we should concentrate on thinking about "what is actually
> >> necessary and valuable" as Charles mentioned above rather than
> >> rejecting any possibilities at least at the gap analysis stage.
> > Thanks for letting me know about SCXML.
> > Although SCXML could be a candidate for new-gen SMIL
> > as you mentioned at the workshop, I think it has lower possibility
> > to be accepted by signage industry than SMIL.
> >
> > It seems to be similar to the topic discussed in W3C and
> > web communities years ago: "XHTML 2 vs. HTML5".
> > I think SMIL supporters in signage industry would like to
> > extend SMIL rather than adopting or developing a new language.
> >
> > Although the doc should include all possibilities as gap analysis,
> > it must be realistic. I don't think SCXML is realistic for now.
> > "Realistic" means the possibility that SCXML will be implemented
> > in web browsers and there are some supporters.
> > As far as I know, no one in signage industry support SCXML.
> > So I don't think we need to add SCXML in the doc now.
> >
> > At least, SMIL is realistic. there are some enthusiastic supporters,
> > and it has already implemented some web browsers, and we can
> > use it (maybe animation only) in HTML through inline SVG now.
> >
> > But I don't deny SCXML completely. If it become realistic
> > and we believe it is useful for creating signage contents,
> > then we should consider it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Futomi
> >
> > --
> > Newphoria Corporation
> > Chief Technology Officer
> > Futomi Hatano
> > --
> > futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp
> > http://www.newphoria.co.jp/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2013 07:37:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:23:26 UTC