- From: mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 09:44:56 -0700
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Cc: "public-webscreens@w3.org" <public-webscreens@w3.org>, "public-secondscreen@w3.org" <public-secondscreen@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALgg+HF9pxm0vRVbmFU4sqPWX02WhS4Pm_-CNSDHR5bLTY5w1w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi < anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Mark, All, > > > On 19 May 2016, at 08:49, mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com> wrote: > > > > Anssi, Community Group participants, > > > > I have prepared a pull request with a draft charter for the Second > Screen Community Group. > > > > https://github.com/webscreens/cg-charter/pull/10 > > > > The PR reflects a starting point for scoping the work on open screen > protocols that we anticipate will take place in the CG going forward; I > don't plan on merging it yet. It reflects Google's position on desirable > scope and deliverables of the upcoming work in the CG. > > > > Along with the draft charter is a list of basic technical requirements > for the protocols, to help start the protocol development work and evaluate > alternatives when the time is ready. > > > > Anssi, I would like a time slot to present an outline of this proposal > to the working group during the second day of the face to face meeting and > host a discussion around it. > > Thanks for preparing this input ahead the meeting. Let's discuss this > proposal on Wednesday (we have some flexibility with respect to preferred > slots, since this touches them all), see: > > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Second_Screen/Meetings/May_2016_F2F#Agenda > > Mark - would you like to have a separate open protocol presentation slot > to complement this? I'm gauging how much time you'd prefer to have. The way > how I would structure Wednesday is to first introduce the proposals and > discuss them and then after lunch look at how the discussed proposals might > map to the future charter(s). > I think a time slot Wednesday AM to introduce the proposal(s) and frame the discussion around the protocol work would be a good idea. I would probably need 15-20 minutes total to outline the key points in the draft. m.
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2016 16:45:45 UTC