Re: Finalizing Second Screen Presentation WG draft charter

LGTM with one question that came to mind.

The proposed update reads:

"Upon approval of the Working Group, the Community Group will cease its
work on the Presentation API specification. It is expected that the
Community Group will recharter to work on other related deliverables where
it is not clear enough how to proceed for it to be a work item for a
Working Group. The Working Group and Community Group will never work on the
same deliverable. The Community Group is only one possible source for work
under future WG Charters, but can serve to do initial exploration for some
future work items."

When it comes to a proposed change that is related to Web second sceen
efforts, would there first be a discussion as to whether it falls in scope
of the Presentation API WG (presumably as defined by the charter), and then
it will be routed to the WG or CG for further consideration?  Is there a
process for this?

It seems like some issues like privacy, user experience, and content
handling will come up in both contexts and I am wondering how we maintain
consistency and cross-communication across both groups.

m.







On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote:

> On 2014-06-16 11:13, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote:
>
>> On 13 Jun 2014, at 12:57, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>  PS: Anssi, happy to prepare a PR with these changes (including the other
>>> changes that Wayne suggested) once the group is ok with them.
>>>
>>
>> That would be great. Perhaps you could start crafting a PR already and
>> update it as the feedback comes in? This way the group could review the
>> changes in context more easily.
>>
>
> Sure, I prepared the corresponding pull request at:
> https://github.com/webscreens/charter/pull/9
>
> All, see the diff for details:
> https://github.com/webscreens/charter/pull/9/files
>
> The resulting HTML page is visible at:
> http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/tidoust/
> charter/blob/wayne/index.html
>
> List of changes:
> - Up to 2 F2F meeting per year (was 1) are now possible on top of F2F at
> TPAC
> - Presentation API description updated, using same wording as in scope
> section
> - Added @@ next to the link to the CG report. Also clarified that the
> report is a final report. This needs to be updated before the AC review,
> either with the link to the final report if it is published or with an
> explanation that the CG is about to finalize the report otherwise
> - Dropped mention of Last Call for the test suite as that step is likely
> to disappear in a near future
> - Updated expectations re. CG focus after WG creation and clarified the
> need for a Dual License accordingly
> - Clarified the overlap with the NSD API and the expected outcome of the
> liaison with the Device APIs WG.
>
> Thanks,
> Francois.
>
>


-- 
http://wiki/Main/OnlyCheckEmailTwiceADay