Friday, 29 November 2024
- Request for Agenda Items: WEBRTC WG December 10 meeting
- [mediacapture-fromelement] The value of `getSettings().frameRate` when captureStream(0) (#102)
Wednesday, 27 November 2024
- [webrtc-svc] scalabilityMode should be marked as existing only for video encodings (#106)
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] Licencia
Tuesday, 26 November 2024
- [mediacapture-transform] Fire a stopped event on VideoTrackGenerator if all downstream tracks are stopped (#117)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Support L4S RFC8888 (#82)
- Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add remote track channelCount
- [webrtc-svc] RTCRtpSender.getCapabilities() should include scalability_modes in returned codec list (#105)
Friday, 22 November 2024
Thursday, 21 November 2024
- [webrtc-pc] How should be populated codecs capabilities fmtp lines? (#3024)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Allow level-id to be different in codec match
Wednesday, 20 November 2024
Tuesday, 19 November 2024
- Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)
- [mediacapture-transform] Track transferability requirement adds complexity to some common use cases (#116)
- [mediacapture-transform] What is the expected timing of MSTP video frame enqueuing with other track events (configurationchange, applyConstraints promise resolution) (#115)
Wednesday, 13 November 2024
- [webrtc-pc] Clarify order of events when the SCTP transport is closed (#3022)
- [webrtc-pc] Clarify that datachannel close is reflected remotely (#3021)
- [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: Add event for CSRC change (#230)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Tab capture control (#49)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider dropping permission for captured surface control APIs (#48)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Should a web page allow to select specific types of event to be forwarded and not others (#47)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] How capturer web applications can know whether forwarding is working/useful (#46)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#45)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Is setting a specific zoom level part of the MVP? (#44)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Supporting zoom via gesture forwarding (#43)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Address click-jacking concerns (#41)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Consideration of proposal to support zoom in/out (#40)
- Re: Summary of the CfA for "Captured Surface Control"
Tuesday, 12 November 2024
- Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Packet sender receiver worker api
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Add RTCRtpTransportProcessor based API
- [webrtc-pc] Codec filter in SDP should consider lower level-id as subsets of greater level-id (#3020)
Friday, 8 November 2024
- [webrtc-pc] Missing resolution attributes from simulcast `addTransceiver` `sendEncodings` API enabling (#3019)
- [mediacapture-main] What is the order of events being track clones? (#1020)
- [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Consideration of proposal to support zoom in/out (#25)
- Summary of the CfA for "Captured Surface Control"
Thursday, 7 November 2024
- [webrtc-stats] Update definitions of corruption detection probabilities to match IETF standard (#790)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Filter codecs preferences on transceiver direction
- Re: Call for Adoption (CfA): "Captured Surface Control"
Wednesday, 6 November 2024
- Re: Call for Adoption (CfA): "Captured Surface Control"
- Re: Call for Adoption (CfA): "Captured Surface Control"
- Re: Call for Adoption (CfA): "Captured Surface Control"
- [mst-content-hint] Should the spec provide guideline on the default degradation preference to use for capture tracks? (#60)
Tuesday, 5 November 2024
- Re: Call for Adoption (CfA): "Captured Surface Control"
- Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)
- Re: Call for Adoption (CfA): "Captured Surface Control"