- From: stefan hakansson <stefhak@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:39:32 +0100
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
All, for the record: I support merging #118 and #129 [1] in the WebRTC Extended Use Cases document [2]. I am currently working for a company [3] delivering games via streaming using WebRTC. We've experienced that a stable delay is extremely important for the gaming experience, and therefore landing * PR#118: Bandwidth feedback Speed(Configurable RTCP transmission interval) which can help avoiding (excessive) buffering in the network and * PR#129: video decoding recovery after packet loss which allows playout to continue even if a video frame is lost would be very important for our services (or, to be more accurate, a solution to meet those requirements is what will help in the end). I will not be able to join the meeting today so I express my support in this way. Stefan PS I now note that this topic has been moved to the end of the agenda so perhaps it won't be covered, but anyway... [1] See https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1I2GUflUU43fzosvoThx4ca_Im1oo86Et6p8-dz1Um9s/edit#slide=id.g26c9012605c_0_0 [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc-nv-use-cases/ [3] https://www.onmo.com/
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2024 14:40:04 UTC