- From: youennf via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:45:12 +0000
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
youennf has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region: == Is BrowserCaptureMediaStreamTrack needed? == BrowserCaptureMediaStreamTrack is used for two purposes: 1. Make sure cloning does not clone the captured region 2. Restrict cropTo exposure to BrowserCaptureMediaStreamTrack 3. Make sure cloning produces a track that has a cropTo method. 1 seems unnecessary looking at the current clone algorithm. 3 is unnecessary, at least if we think 2 is not needed. Probably it is unnecessary given that CanvasCaptureMediaStreamTrack clone is a CanvasCaptureMediaStreamTrack and does not expose a dedicated clone method. The question is then whether it is better to expose cropTo at MediaStreamTrack or at BrowserCaptureMediaStreamTrack level. I am not sure BrowserCaptureMediaStreamTrack is worth it for the sole purpose of exposing cropTo, we are anyway exposing https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-screen-share/#displaycapturesurfacetype. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/issues/10 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 25 January 2022 12:45:13 UTC