On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 12:18 PM Tim Panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk> wrote: > I think the (un?) surprising part of the matrix presentation was the > desire to intercept fetch() in order to make it simpler to put existing > UX’s onto the new p2p browser mesh. > In other words they wanted to be in the service worker so that the > (complex) UI page(s) could continue using the same REST API as when it was > talking to a server based crypto backend. Their view is that this would > greatly speed adoption. > This was my read of the presentation as well, which in hindsight doesn't seem a sufficient reason to contemplate exposing RTCPeerConnection in workers. It suggests an application written from scratch wouldn't have this problem. What am I missing?
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2022 18:59:03 UTC