Hi Silvia
Sorry for the delay -- I am just working through email from vacation.
> Are there any plans to change the API to allow any element to go PIP?
We're working on a newer version of PiP that allows arbitrary web content.
The explainer
<https://github.com/steimelchrome/document-pip-explainer/blob/main/explainer.md>
goes
into a bit more detail, but TL;DR: the site may open a PiP window that has
its own document, and can add / move elements to it as it sees fit. Please
give it a read and let us know what you think!
Thanks
Frank
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:29 PM Elad Alon <eladalon@google.com> wrote:
> Pulling @Frank Liberato <liberato@google.com> and @Tommy Steimel
> <steimel@google.com> into this thread.
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 10:38 PM Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've recently found the picture in picture API to be of limited use. I'm
>> wondering what the experience of others is with it.
>>
>> It's great to have the picture in picture API - it allows a video call to
>> sit on top of apps so people can get their work done without losing visual
>> contact with their video peer.
>>
>> However, the API only allows a single video element into the overlay.
>> That's very limiting, particularly on multipeer calls.
>>
>> Are there any plans to change the API to allow any element to go PIP?
>> Similar to how we changed the full screen API to apply to any element?
>>
>> Curious about other people's thoughts.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Silvia.
>>
>>
--
*I sometimes work nonstandard hours. Please don't feel any urgency to
respond outside of your working hours.*