- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 08:53:46 -0400
- To: Youenn Fablet <youenn@apple.com>
- Cc: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABr+gEjcrfgwuOsW_-MEtk=MtQ9VN60x0HGG6d9xh=xb20tnPA@mail.gmail.com>
I support Section 5 of mediacapture-extensions On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 6:10 AM Youenn Fablet <youenn@apple.com> wrote: > I support Section 5 of mediacapture-extensions. > > On 7 Sep 2021, at 05:02, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) on Transferrable MediaStreamTracks, > which are described in Section 5 of the Mediacapture-Extensions document > (currently an editors draft without WG consensus): > > https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-extensions/#transferable-mediastreamtrack > > In response, please state one of the following: > > - I support Section 5 of mediacapture-extensions > - I object to Section 5 of mediacapture-extensions due to issues filed > in open bug <#number> > > The CfC will end on September 27, 2021 > > Bernard > > For the Chairs > > Process explanation > > Extensions documents such as WebRTC-Extensions and Mediacapture-Extensions > exist to incubate material that may eventually be folded into future > iterations of existing documents (WebRTC-PC 1.0 and MediaCapture & Streams, > respectively). > > However, as these Extension documents have been Editor's Drafts for > considerable periods of time without issuance of a Working Group Draft, > they cannot be considered to represent the consensus of the WEBRTC WG. > > It was pointed out that this situation could result in "late surprises" > (e.g. controversy about incorporation of portions of an extension document > into the main document at some future date, potentially long after the > material was first incorporated into the extension document, by which time > the controversial elements may already be in use by applications). > > To avoid such a situation, it is desirable to determine WG consensus early > on significant aspects of the Extensions documents, so that issues can be > raised and potentially addressed prior to implementation. > > In this instance, changes to enable Transferrable MediaStreamTracks were > included in merged PR 30 which can be found here: > https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-extensions/pull/30 > > The entire text (lines 350 - 420) can be viewed here: > > https://github.com/youennf/mediacapture-extensions/blob/ffbb6836d4a5fef4abef5d83fb15bec1abc65fbd/index.html > > Note that since a CfC has not been run on the entire > Mediacapture-extensions document, this CfC only applies to Transferrable > MediaStreamTracks and not to other aspects which may be covered by > subsequent CfCs. It therefore does not bear on the overall WG consensus for > Mediacapture-Extensions. > > > -- .: Jan-Ivar :.
Received on Monday, 20 September 2021 12:54:13 UTC