- From: T H Panton <tim@pi.pe>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:35:08 +0200
- To: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 18 October 2021 18:35:25 UTC
> On 18 Oct 2021, at 19:58, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com> wrote: > > At the WebRTC WG Virtual Interim meeting on Thursday, October 14, 2021 we discussed the path forward on mediacapture-transform API. The slides from the meeting are available here: > https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1rdaRvl3h3viqvndyJVzwIAPtOpMjx_2u7q7MBHUwbyY/ <https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1rdaRvl3h3viqvndyJVzwIAPtOpMjx_2u7q7MBHUwbyY/> > > We would now like to get a "sense of the WG" on the following questions: > > Question 1: Should mediacapture-transform be based on streams? Yes > > Question 2: Should mediacapture-transform support audio? No > > Question 3: Should mediacapture-transform be exposed on the main thread? No > > > Potential answers to the questions are "Yes", "No" or "Undecided". > > Please respond to this "Sense of the WG" poll by Monday, October 25, 2021 at midnight Pacific Time. Stepping outside the rules of the poll, I’d add that my answers to 2 and 3 would ideally be “not yet, possibly never, because they are unnecessary duplication.” But that’s not an option :-) Tim (CTO pi.pe GmbH)
Received on Monday, 18 October 2021 18:35:25 UTC