Re: WebRTC 1.0 is a W3C Recommendation

Good job everyone! :D Woohooo!

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 3:46 PM Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
wrote:

> It is my great pleasure to announce that WebRTC 1.0 has just been
> published as a W3C Recommendation:
>   https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/REC-webrtc-20210126/
>
> You can also see the accompanying press release
> https://www.w3.org/2021/01/pressrelease-webrtc-rec.html
>
> This publication follows shortly after IETF released last week the last
> batch of the many RFCs on which our API builds:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/gb_AS4g0n-kmqtPG3f2A_7TPntE/
>
> We still have lots of work ahead of us, but I would like to the
> opportunity to thank the many people who've made this possible one or
> another:
> * the former and current chairs of the group: Stefan Hakansson, Harald
> Alvestrand, Erik Lagerway, Bernard Aboba, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey,
> * my fellow staff contacts who've worked with the group over the years:
> François Daoust, Vivien Lacourba, Carine Bournez,
> * the 257 individuals who at point or another participated in the group,
> * the many contributors to the spec
> https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/graphs/contributors,
> * the 60 people who helped build the test suite that we used to guide
> implementation and interoperability progress,
> * and first and foremost, the former and current editors of the spec:
> Cullen Jennings, Henrik Boström, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey, Adam Bergkvist,
> Daniel Burnett, Anant Narayanan, Bernard Aboba, Taylor Brandstetter
>
> Our group is 3554 days old, we met 57 times in teleconferences, 16 times
> F2F, exchanged 10114 emails (make that 10115), built the spec through
> 4658 commits merged from 1282 pull requests to resolve 1320 issues,
> resulting in a spec of 55897 words that define 622 lines of IDL
> featuring 20 interfaces, 37 dictionaries, 22 enums, tested by 149 test
> cases with 1789 test assertions.
>
> But more than these metrics, 2020 made abundantly clear to the world how
> critical this work has been; there is a lot more that we need to do -
> but for a minute or two, let us take the time to pride ourselves of the
> work accomplished and the impact we've had.
>
> Dom
>
>