Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): WebRTC Encoded Transform as a WG Draft

I support promoting the document to WG draft.
I believe the document is in a sufficiently good shape as a FPWD, which, AFAIK, does not entail a very high level of stability and maturity.

In particular, the algorithms already have a good amount of precision and have been validated by a first implementation.
The concept behind the draft has also been validated through the WebRTC Insertable Streams API.

I agree with the concerns expressed by Bernard for video over RTP, and this needs to be addressed before moving forward to CR, PR and REC.
I think there are several options to solve that particular issue, some being in the full hands of the W3C WebRTC WG.


> On 9 Aug 2021, at 23:46, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) for promotion of "WebRTC Encoded Transform" to WG Draft. 
> 
> The document is available for inspection here: 
> WebRTC Encoded Transform (w3c.github.io) <https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-encoded-transform/>
> 
> The Github repo is here: 
> w3c/webrtc-encoded-transform: WebRTC Encoded Transform (github.com) <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-encoded-transform>
> 
> The CfC will last until August 30, 2021. 
> 
> In response, please state one of the following: 
> I support promoting the document to WG draft. 
> I object to promoting the document, due to Issues listed below (please include links to the Github Issues). 
> Bernard Aboba
> For the Chairs