Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): WebRTC Encoded Transform as a WG Draft

(Chair hat off).

I object to promoting this document to WG Draft, due to concerns about Section 4 (SFrameTransform).  Within the IETF, proposals for SFrame over RTP have been controversial and so far have not been adopted by a WG.

At IETF 111, an alternative to SFRame over RTP (SPacket) was proposed.  It therefore seems premature to me to introduce an API that is specific to a protocol proposal that may not gain traction.

I have filed a GitHub issue here:
Protocol Reference for SFrameTransform · Issue #112 · w3c/webrtc-encoded-transform (github.com)<https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-encoded-transform/issues/112>