(Chair hat off). I object to promoting this document to WG Draft, due to concerns about Section 4 (SFrameTransform). Within the IETF, proposals for SFrame over RTP have been controversial and so far have not been adopted by a WG. At IETF 111, an alternative to SFRame over RTP (SPacket) was proposed. It therefore seems premature to me to introduce an API that is specific to a protocol proposal that may not gain traction. I have filed a GitHub issue here: Protocol Reference for SFrameTransform · Issue #112 · w3c/webrtc-encoded-transform (github.com)<https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-encoded-transform/issues/112>Received on Monday, 9 August 2021 22:23:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 9 August 2021 22:23:58 UTC