- From: Henrik Boström <hbos@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:59:17 +0200
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEbRw2xG0UihLcHN-qSux7JefXyy=UVuKNCWBfi_cuzPMH174g@mail.gmail.com>
Did these minutes ever get added to w3c.org? I couldn't find it On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:04 PM Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > These are the UNEDITED minutes. > > > (06:36:03 PM) hta: This is the minutes of the W3C WEBRTC meeting > (06:36:25 PM) hta: Issue 2026: Should WPT webrtc folder be renamed to > webrtc-pc? > (06:36:25 PM) ***trackbot doesn't understand that ISSUE command. > (06:40:21 PM) hta: Decision: Consult with Dom & other experts. > (06:41:26 PM) hta: Issue #2080: Fix in #2071 is accepted. > (06:41:26 PM) ***trackbot doesn't understand that ISSUE command. > (06:41:58 PM) hta: Examples need to be consistent with this. > (06:42:24 PM) hta: orphis will file a bug if examples need updates. > (06:42:58 PM) hta: Issue #2141: > (06:42:58 PM) ***trackbot doesn't understand that ISSUE command. > (06:48:58 PM) hta: Missing specification to assing bandwidth between > layers > (06:49:34 PM) *lgrahl [~lgrahl@public.cloak] entered the room.* > (06:56:24 PM) hta: Bernard: consult with RMCAT > (06:56:58 PM) hta: Jan-Ivar: Max-bitrate allocations may reasonably imply > expectations of relative bitrates. > (06:57:38 PM) hta: Decision: We place non-normative text in the WEBRTC > document. (no SHOULD). > (06:59:03 PM) hta: -Issue 2116: Simulcast stats implications > (07:01:12 PM) hta: Moving stuff between dictionaries. > (07:01:41 PM) hta: - Issue 2116: Simulcast stats (2): > (07:01:52 PM) hta: Add RTCoutboundRtpStream.rid > (07:02:38 PM) hta: Decision: Hbos' plan accepted. > (07:03:06 PM) hta: - Issue 2116: Simulcast stats - figuring out which > layer we're getting? > (07:04:40 PM) hta: Varun: Reason for wanting to learn which layer is that > we could diagnose changes in quality. > (07:08:17 PM) hta: Bernard: This is an IETF matter to write guidelines / > specs on. > (07:08:50 PM) hta: Henrik: A note in the stats doc saying "if you relay > the CSRC, it will appear in stats" is good. > (07:10:24 PM) hta: Decision: Henrik will write a note and put it in the > stats spec. > (07:10:40 PM) hta: - Issue 401: How can we support SVC in stats? > (07:11:36 PM) hta: Decision: We will add a "scalability mode" to > RTC*RtpStreamStats (along with the codec) > (07:19:45 PM) hta: Decision: Continue discussion in issue #401. > (07:19:56 PM) hta: - Issue 2121: Constrainable properties on remote tracks > (07:22:53 PM) hta: Decision: Hbos will create a PR with the definition of > constraints that make sense for remote tracks. > (07:23:55 PM) hta: - Issue 2150 / PR 2168: transceiver.stop() rendered > harmless > (07:30:17 PM) *anssik left the room (quit: "Connection closed for > inactivity").* > (07:38:18 PM) hta: Decision: We will go forward with this proposal, and > discuss in a separate bug whether media should stop flowing when in > "stopping" state. > (07:38:38 PM) hta: Mediacapture ------------------ > (07:38:53 PM) hta: - Issue 102: Clarify what audio is captured and what > "application" means > (07:40:42 PM) hta: Decision: "application" means "document". Replace in > spec. > (07:41:04 PM) hta: - Issue 103: Which audio constraints are applicable to > getDisplayMedia? > (07:43:17 PM) hta: Decision: Start off by saying "no constraints > supported". > (07:43:37 PM) hta: ---------- Mediacapture - main -------------- > (07:43:52 PM) hta: - Issue 551: Should we allow empty string device IDs? > (07:53:48 PM) hta: Decision: Youenn will provide a PR and discussion will > continue. > (07:54:07 PM) hta: - Issue 559: Fingerprinting related to exposing > non-default capture devices > (07:54:24 PM) hta: All issues have been resolved, issue is closed. > (07:54:46 PM) hta: - Issue 561: Delay processing is incorporated. Issue > closed. > (07:55:07 PM) hta: - Issue 562: Fix incoorporated. Issue closed. > (07:58:57 PM) hta: - Issue 573: Removing onoverconstrained > (08:00:25 PM) hta: Decision: WG supports removal. Chairs will consult > with Dom on how to remove the feature. > (08:00:58 PM) hta: Does someone know how to turn this into minutes? > > -- > Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark. > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2019 13:59:52 UTC