- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 02:45:31 +0100
- To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4920a898-3eb4-ac65-e9b4-bf53c3642c49@alvestrand.no>
** *This is to announce that we are trying to ar*r*ange a*WEBRTC Hackathon Event* at the IETF in Prague in March*.** * Specifically, as part of the IETF Hackathon event - March 23 and 24 (Sat and Sun before the IETF). ** Some preliminary thoughts below. *Action requested:**//**We'd like to have representatives of multiple browser development teams present - ideally, we'd like one* *person to be a contact point for each browser, with the responsibility to make sure we have a test setup that will give us* *the support we need before the meeting.* * * Harald, for the chairs ** *Suggested time: Prague IETF, Hackathon event* *Suggested format: Grab a table during the IETF hackathon* * Target: Work on WEBRTC testing Possible goals: * Get tests written that cover interesting use cases o WPT testable things o KITE testable things * Get browsers fixed to actually pass tests o Requires approvers to be present o Requires off-site resources available Things that need to happen up front: * Get a list of things that need to be worked on (“the backlog”) * Make a setup to show improvements o Could have a KITE or a WPT testbench into which we can upload tested browsers and new tests o Test-writers’ goal is to cause more failures o Fix-writers’ goal is to reduce the # of failures o Make it a race :-) We can NOT expect to actually submit code into respective canaries, so if we want to show off merged results of fixing bugs, we need to have some integration that collects the fixes on an “ad hoc” basis. * Suggested time: Prague IETF, Hackathon event Suggested format: Grab a table during the IETF hackathon Target: Work on WEBRTC testing Possible goals: * Get tests written that cover interesting use cases o WPT testable things o KITE testable things * Get browsers fixed to actually pass tests o Requires approvers to be present o Requires off-site resources available Things that need to happen up front: * Get a list of things that need to be worked on (“the backlog”) * Make a setup to show improvements o Could have a KITE or a WPT testbench into which we can upload tested browsers and new tests o Test-writers’ goal is to cause more failures o Fix-writers’ goal is to reduce the # of failures o Make it a race :-) We can NOT expect to actually submit code into respective canaries, so if we want to show off merged results of fixing bugs, we need to have some integration that collects the fixes on an “ad hoc” basis. * -- Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
Received on Saturday, 26 January 2019 01:46:03 UTC