- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:31:44 -0700
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, public-webrtc@w3.org
On 9/11/18 7:30 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Le 29/08/2018 à 23:18, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit : >> The QUIC API for WebRTC [0] asserts it is an Editor's Draft, which is a >> spec status [1] reserved for official working group documents. > > For sake of clarity, respec (the tool used to produce some of the W3C > documents) is not authoritative on this; the Process Document only has > this to say about Editor's Draft: > "Working Groups and Interest Groups may make available "Editor's > drafts". Editor's drafts have no official standing whatsoever, and do > not necessarily imply consensus of a Working Group or Interest Group, > nor are their contents endorsed in any way by W3C." > > In other words, the status and meaning associated with editors draft as > it stands varies from WG to WG, and cannot really be assumed to have any > standing whatsoever. > > To reduce some of this uncertainty, some groups have adopted the > "unofficial draft" label. Thanks for the clarification. I've finally submitted a tiny PR: https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-quic/pull/87 Peter
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2018 23:32:08 UTC