Re: Call for adoption - WEBRTC-QUIC

On 11/20/2018 09:09 PM, Roman Shpount wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see what is being added, but I see no explanation in this document
> or announcement why it is being added.

the presentation given by Peter at TPAC is at
https://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/images/a/a8/WebRTC_QUIC_status.pdf

and Peter's presentation of it is in the video recording.
It may answer some of your questions.

>
> What additional functionality or capabilities would QUICK add to webrtc?
>
> Regards,
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 3:58 AM Harald Alvestrand
> <harald@alvestrand.no <mailto:harald@alvestrand.no>> wrote:
>
>     **
>
>     *From the Lyon summary of decisions:*
>
>     *
>
>     "The WG will ask the list if we should adopt the WEBRTC-QUIC API
>     document (in room: 2 opposed, ~10 in favor)"
>
>     The question is whether we should adopt this document:
>
>     **https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-quic/
>
>     as a Working Group document
>
>     Adoption as a WG document does not mean commitment to any specific
>     part of the API, or any specific timeline for processing the
>     document to CR and beyond, but does mean that we can issue the
>     document as a first public working draft (FPWD) and ask for IPR
>     declarations (if any).
>
>
>     My personal read is that adoption as a WG document means that "we
>     have consensus that there is a problem here that needs solving,
>     the problem is within the scope of this WG, and this document is a
>     start on the way to solving it".
>
>     Non-adoption would indicate either that the problem shouldn't be
>     solved, that the problem is out of scope for this WG, or that this
>     document is so far away from the right solution that it's not a
>     starting point the WG wants to consider.
>
>
>     We are seeking both statements of support and statements of
>     opposition. The chairs will tally the responses and attempt to
>     draw a conclusion.
>
>     Please state your opinion to the**list on or before Wednesday,
>     November 28.
>
>     Harald*,* for the chairs
>
>     *
>