public-webrtc@w3.org from March 2018 by date

Saturday, 31 March 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Data channel closing procedure Lennart Grahl via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] RTCPeerConnection.close procedure: Data Channel & SCTP questions Lennart Grahl via GitHub

Friday, 30 March 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Link to correct statechange event per transport Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] statechange Event always points to RTCIceTransport's statechange Event Lennart Grahl via GitHub

Thursday, 29 March 2018

• Fwd: Web Real-Time Communications Working Group Charter Extended Dominique Hazael-Massieux

Wednesday, 28 March 2018

• Web Real-Time Communications Working Group Charter Extended Xueyuan

Tuesday, 27 March 2018

• [webrtc-pc] RTCDataChannel.id assignment Lennart Grahl via GitHub
• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• April VI: timeslot picked Stefan Håkansson LK

Monday, 26 March 2018

• [webrtc-pc] DOMException(name=<Exception>) or instances of <Exception>? Lennart Grahl via GitHub

Thursday, 22 March 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Require RTCRtpHeaderExtensionParameters members. jan-ivar via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Describe how ICE restarts affect the RTCIceTransportState. Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Limit sendEncodings to video. jan-ivar via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Simulcast makes no sense for audio. jan-ivar via GitHub

Wednesday, 21 March 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Does direction matter for rejected m= sections? Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] RTCDataChannelEventInit is not optional Nils Ohlmeier via GitHub
• Reminder: Re: Doodle for April VI Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102 Alexandre GOUAILLARD

Tuesday, 20 March 2018

• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update structured cloning for recent changes to HTML stefan hakansson via GitHub

Monday, 19 March 2018

• Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102 Peter Thatcher
• Re: WebRTC REF for OAUTH based TURN Mészáros Mihály
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCDataChannel: Specify common create steps for locally and remotely created channels Adam Bergkvist via GitHub

Sunday, 18 March 2018

• Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102 Bernard Aboba

Saturday, 17 March 2018

• [webrtc-pc] either full check certs or explain why it's not necessary (4.4.1.1 Constructor) Samuel Weiler via GitHub
• Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102 Cullen Jennings
• Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102 Stefan Håkansson LK

Friday, 16 March 2018

• Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102 Varun Singh
• Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102 Peter Thatcher
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Split out RTCRtpDecodingParameters and fix active. jan-ivar via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Inconsistency over active member in receiver's "encoding" parameters. jan-ivar via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Split out RTCSendRtpParameters and mark parameters as required. jan-ivar via GitHub
• Re: Encoders (Re: Getting rid of SDP) - Timestamps for media Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Encoders (Re: Getting rid of SDP) - Timestamps for media Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Encoders (Re: Getting rid of SDP) - Timestamps for media Cullen Jennings
• Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102 Cullen Jennings

Thursday, 15 March 2018

• Re: How to register with Google as a WebRTC developer Iñaki Baz Castillo
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Editorial: Remove stars from links Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update mandatory to implement stats Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• Re: 答复: How to register with Google as a WebRTC developer Iñaki Baz Castillo
• 答复: How to register with Google as a WebRTC developer Horsley Robert

Wednesday, 14 March 2018

• Re: WebRTC REF for OAUTH based TURN Mészáros Mihály
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Handling of KeyingMaterial internal slot Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• Re: WebRTC REF for OAUTH based TURN Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102 Peter Thatcher
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Revert changes to transceiver at rollback. stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102 Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: WebRTC REF for OAUTH based TURN Harald Alvestrand

Tuesday, 13 March 2018

• Re: Getting rid of SDP Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Encoders (Re: Getting rid of SDP) Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Encoders (Re: Getting rid of SDP) Cullen Jennings
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fix warnings on definitions from ReSpec upgrade to 20.4 Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• WebRTC REF for OAUTH based TURN Cullen Jennings
• Doodle for April VI Stefan Håkansson LK
• Moving forward with Transition Request to CR for “WebRTC Statistics” Stefan Håkansson LK

Monday, 12 March 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Should a signalingstatechange event be fired when closing a RTCPeerConnection? youennf via GitHub
• Re: Move forward with 'Content Hints' Cullen Jennings
• [webrtc-pc] Fix respec warnings surfaced by 20.0.4 Florent Castelli via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Upgrade to Respec 20.0.4 Vivien Lacourba via GitHub

Thursday, 8 March 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Remove * at the end of links? Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Unable to distinguish "sender" stats if multiple senders are sending the same track henbos via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] RTCDataChannel: Remotely initiated channels needs to get all slots defined Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Buffered amount slot Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Editorial: Some interfaces are missing links Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• Move forward with 'Content Hints' Stefan Håkansson LK
• [webrtc-pc] Editorial: Don't "set" the readonly bufferedAmount attribute Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Test guidelines: Add option to use 'help link' to reference specific section Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCDataChannel: Specify that a string argument to send must be encoded Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] remoteSource is needed for 'track' stats henbos via GitHub

Wednesday, 7 March 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fix another typo in section ID Florent Castelli via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: s/ PeerConnection/ RTCPeerConnection/g Philipp Hancke via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Add stat for RTTs between client and STUN/TURN server Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub

Tuesday, 6 March 2018

• Re: Encoders (Re: Getting rid of SDP) Peter Thatcher
• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: Encoders (Re: Getting rid of SDP) Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Why QUIC is better than sliced bread Michael Tuexen
• Encoders (Re: Getting rid of SDP) Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Peter Thatcher
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)

Monday, 5 March 2018

• Re: Getting rid of SDP Peter Thatcher
• Re: Getting rid of SDP youenn fablet
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Peter Thatcher
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Why QUIC is better than sliced bread Peter Thatcher
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Peter Thatcher
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Why QUIC is better than sliced bread Michael Tuexen
• Re: Getting rid of UDP Peter Thatcher
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Why QUIC is better than sliced bread Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Why QUIC is better than sliced bread Peter Thatcher
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Peter Thatcher
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Cullen Jennings
• RE: Getting rid of UDP Bernard Aboba
• Why QUIC is better than sliced bread Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Getting rid of SDP (relation to ORTC) Peter Thatcher
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Sergio Garcia Murillo
• RE: Getting rid of RTP Bernard Aboba
• Re: Getting rid of SDP (relation to ORTC) Lennart Grahl
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Roman Shpount
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Getting rid of SDP (relation to ORTC) Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Peter Thatcher
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Peter Thatcher
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Peter Thatcher
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Getting rid of SDP (relation to ORTC) Cullen Jennings
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Peter Thatcher
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Lennart Grahl
• Re: Getting rid of SDP youenn fablet
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Sherwin Sim
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Sherwin Sim
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Bernard Aboba
• Re: Getting rid of SDP Peter Thatcher
• Getting rid of SDP Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fix typo in section IDs: rtcprtp -> rtcrtp Florent Castelli via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: fix RTCIceCandidate.toJson description Philipp Hancke via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] IceCandidate.toJson method refers to "description" attribute Harald Alvestrand via GitHub

Friday, 2 March 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Upgrade to Respec 20.0.3 Vivien Lacourba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Annotate definitions with IDL marker for compat with ReSpec 19.6 Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Define description.sdp for rollback for setLocalDescription stefan hakansson via GitHub

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2018 22:05:08 UTC