Tuesday, 31 July 2018
Monday, 30 July 2018
- More checks for RTCRtpSender.setParameters()?
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Made maxFramerate and scaleResolutionDownBy unsigned long (were: doub…
Thursday, 26 July 2018
Wednesday, 25 July 2018
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fire track event in response to remote sender.setStreams() changes.
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add warning to RTCRtpTransceiver.stop(). Stop rejected transceivers at SLD().
- [webrtc-pc] Mandating [SecureContext]
- Doodle Poll for WebRTC WG Virtual Interim, week of August 27-31, 2018
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCRtpReceiver.streams
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCRtpSender.streamIds
Tuesday, 24 July 2018
- Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)
- Web Real-Time Communications Working Group Revised Charter Approved; Call for Participation
Monday, 23 July 2018
Sunday, 22 July 2018
Saturday, 21 July 2018
Thursday, 19 July 2018
- Feature policy: Introspection
- Reminder - Re: TPAC 2018 registration now open
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clarify stats lifetimes and statsended event.
- [webrtc-pc] Direction can get out of sync, blocking updates.
Tuesday, 17 July 2018
- Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Reject promise at replaceTrack if TRX is stopped.
- [webrtc-pc] Promise should be rejected if transceiver is stopped
Monday, 16 July 2018
Sunday, 15 July 2018
- [webrtc-pc] Identity needs to refer to track not stream
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Move isolated streams to identity spec
- [webrtc-pc] RTCError suberrors for identity should move to identity spec
Friday, 13 July 2018
- [webrtc-pc] Should / does the order of replaceTrack and direction matter?
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fix RTCRtpSender/Receiver.getCapabilities() return type
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
Thursday, 12 July 2018
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- RE: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- [webrtc-pc] Move [[WEBRTC-IDENTITY]] to its own repo
- Fwd: Call for Participation: W3C Workshop on Permissions and User Consent
- Re: Issue 1858: the astonishing behavior of transceiver.stop
- Re: Issue 1858: the astonishing behavior of transceiver.stop
- Re: Issue 1858: the astonishing behavior of transceiver.stop
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
- Differential protection (was SVC)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- [webrtc-pc] Rename sender.transport.transport to sender.transport.iceTransport?
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- [webrtc-pc] Move Isolated Streams from [[WEBRTC]] to [[WEBRTC-IDENTITY]]
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCSctpTransportState cleanup
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: What sender.getParameters().codecs returns before negotiation
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
Tuesday, 10 July 2018
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Delete Example 14
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Explain why additional certificate checks are unnecessary
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: "direction" and rtcrtpheaderextensionparameters
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Issue 1858: the astonishing behavior of transceiver.stop
- Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)
- [webrtc-stats] References to "objectDeleted" can be removed
- [webrtc-stats] RTCIceCandidateStats.deleted can be removed
Monday, 9 July 2018
Friday, 6 July 2018
Thursday, 5 July 2018
Wednesday, 4 July 2018
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
Tuesday, 3 July 2018
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0
- Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0
- Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)
- Call for Exclusions: Identifiers for WebRTC's Statistics API
- Call for Exclusions: MediaStreamTrack Content Hints; WebRTC DSCP Control API
- WebRTC Stats as CR and FPWD of Content Hint, DSCP Marking