- From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:00:11 +0000
- To: Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- CC: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Hi, For IETF ART, I guess the ICE WG should also be listed. Regards, Christer On 19/02/18 15:56, "Lennart Grahl" <lennart.grahl@gmail.com> wrote: >A nit: It probably makes sense to add TSVWG to the list of IETF working >groups that are of particular interest for us since this is where SCTP >stuff is specified (ndata in RFC 8260, DTLS/SCTP in RFC 8261, ...). > >Cheers >Lennart > > >On 15.02.2018 08:41, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: >> All, >> >> based on the feedback received we've updated the proposed charter [1] >> for our continued work. (As you know the current one [2] expires March >> this year.) >> >> Our target is to send it to the Advisory Committee for approval after >> the VI next week [3] (where we will discuss it) given we don't hear >> objections. >> >> Stefan for the chairs >> >> [1] https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-charter/webrtc-charter.html >> [2] https://www.w3.org/2015/07/webrtc-charter.html >> [3] https://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/February_21_2018 >> >
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2018 13:00:52 UTC