- From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 20:33:54 +0100
- To: Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
> On 19. Feb 2018, at 14:56, Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com> wrote: > > A nit: It probably makes sense to add TSVWG to the list of IETF working > groups that are of particular interest for us since this is where SCTP > stuff is specified (ndata in RFC 8260, DTLS/SCTP in RFC 8261, ...). I agree with Lennart. Adding support for 0-RTT association setup, RACK or BBR for SCTP or any other SCTP extension for WebRTC most likely would be done in TSVWG. Best regards Michael > > Cheers > Lennart > > > On 15.02.2018 08:41, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: >> All, >> >> based on the feedback received we've updated the proposed charter [1] >> for our continued work. (As you know the current one [2] expires March >> this year.) >> >> Our target is to send it to the Advisory Committee for approval after >> the VI next week [3] (where we will discuss it) given we don't hear >> objections. >> >> Stefan for the chairs >> >> [1] https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-charter/webrtc-charter.html >> [2] https://www.w3.org/2015/07/webrtc-charter.html >> [3] https://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/February_21_2018 >> >
Received on Monday, 19 February 2018 19:34:26 UTC