public-webrtc@w3.org from February 2018 by date

Wednesday, 28 February 2018

• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Add build status icon and README minor reflresh Vivien Lacourba via GitHub
• Re: Updated proposed charter Christer Holmberg

Tuesday, 27 February 2018

• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Result of the first webrtc developers survey Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Call for Consensus (CfC) to transition “WebRTC Statistics” to Candidate Recommendation” - respond by March 10, 2018 Stefan Håkansson LK

Monday, 26 February 2018

• Re: Plan for charter Nils Ohlmeier
• Identity hackathon at IETF-101 in London Harald Alvestrand

Saturday, 24 February 2018

• Re: Summary of "What would you like to see in WebRTC next?" Alexandre GOUAILLARD

Friday, 23 February 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update mandatory to implement stats based on stats dictionary renames Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Duplicate definitions errors (following udpate to respec 19.6.0) Vivien Lacourba via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] WebIDL issue Vivien Lacourba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update webrtc-respec-ci integration following respec and Travis CI current practices Vivien Lacourba via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Normalize RTCPeerConnection and PeerConnection Harald Alvestrand via GitHub

Thursday, 22 February 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Create a Dtmf internal slot and initialize it in RtpSender Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Update webrtc-respec-ci integration following respec current practices Vivien Lacourba via GitHub
• Plan for charter Stefan Håkansson LK
• [minutes] WebRTC WG Virtual Interim 21 February 2018 Vivien Lacourba

Wednesday, 21 February 2018

• Re: Summary of "What would you like to see in WebRTC next?" Silvia Pfeiffer
• [webrtc-pc] Recycling an m= section may not remove the old transceiver's remote track from its stream Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• Re: Summary of "What would you like to see in WebRTC next?" Harald Alvestrand
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Sergio Garcia Murillo
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: obsolete RTCIceCandidatePairStats priority lennart-csio via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: renaming RTCRTPStreamStats to RTCRtpStreamStats karthikbr82 via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Renaming RTCRTPStreamStats to RTCRtpStreamStats karthikbr82 via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Add hugeFramesSent to RTCVideoSenderStats ilnik via GitHub
• Summary of "What would you like to see in WebRTC next?" Peter Thatcher
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Randell Jesup

Tuesday, 20 February 2018

• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: Updated proposed charter Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [webrtc-pc] DTMF sending: Permit only in connected status? Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Does RTCRtpSender's dtmf attribute return the same object every time? Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub

Monday, 19 February 2018

• Re: Updated proposed charter Michael Tuexen
• [webrtc-pc] RTCPeerConnection lacks identity marker beyond current process Elad Alon via GitHub
• Re: Updated proposed charter Lennart Grahl
• Reminder: VI Wednesday this week Stefan Håkansson LK
• [webrtc-pc] DTMF should not send before connecting Harald Alvestrand via GitHub

Friday, 16 February 2018

• [webrtc-stats] Add hugeFramesSent counter to RTCVideoSenderStats dictionary ilnik via GitHub

Thursday, 15 February 2018

• New Editor for Screen Capture Stefan Håkansson LK
• [webrtc-pc] Simplify candidate interaction by allowing Null Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] "make travissetup" does not work on mac henbos via GitHub
• Updated proposed charter Stefan Håkansson LK
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Enqueue replaceTrack, and remove sync setting of track. jan-ivar via GitHub

Wednesday, 14 February 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Update mandatory to implement stats based on stats dictionary renames Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Is isRemote on RTCIceCandidateStats still necessary? na-g via GitHub

Tuesday, 13 February 2018

• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Evalution of direction not relevant for replaceTrack. stefan hakansson via GitHub

Monday, 12 February 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Semi-sync replaceTrack API pre-initial-negotiation is bizarre. jan-ivar via GitHub

Saturday, 10 February 2018

• Fwd: [w3c/web-platform-tests] Rewrite RTC ICE and DTLS transport tests with alternative dependencies (#9424) Alexandre GOUAILLARD

Friday, 9 February 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Make initial state of dataChannel.readyState always be "connecting". jan-ivar via GitHub

Thursday, 8 February 2018

• WebRTC developers survey Sergio Garcia Murillo

Wednesday, 7 February 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fix remaining compat issue with respec 19 Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Rename "mediaType" to "kind" in RTCRTPStreamStats. henbos via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Moved trackId from RTCRTPStreamStats to RTC[In/Out]boundRTPStreamStats. henbos via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Track ID doesn't make sense for remote RTCRtpMediaStream stats Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Clarify stats hierarchies henbos via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: senderId and receiverId added to RTCRTPStreamStats henbos via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Rename sender/receiver/track dictionaries henbos via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCRtpTransceiver.direction is writable. jianjunz via GitHub

Tuesday, 6 February 2018

• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• [webrtc-pc] Transceiver kind attribute Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• Re: WPT test dependencies Harald Alvestrand
• Re: WPT test dependencies Alexandre GOUAILLARD

Monday, 5 February 2018

• [webrtc-pc] reducing audio packet rate while track is disabled Philipp Hancke via GitHub
• Re: WPT test dependencies Philipp Hancke
• [webrtc-stats] RTCIceCandidatePairStats.priority is wrong jan-ivar via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fix compatibility with ReSpec 19 Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
• Re: How to register with Google as a WebRTC developer Tsahi Levent-Levi
• How to register with Google as a WebRTC developer Horsley Robert
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Toshiya Nakakura

Friday, 2 February 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Removing 'readonly' from Tranceiver's 'direction'. stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Harald Alvestrand
• [webrtc-pc] Initial data channel state is inconsistent Nils Ohlmeier via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpSynchronizationSource.audioLevel algorithmic equality na-g via GitHub
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Toshiya Nakakura
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Toshiya Nakakura

Thursday, 1 February 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Change [[AssociatedMediaStreams]] to [[AssociatedMediaStreamIds]] jan-ivar via GitHub
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Randell Jesup
• [webrtc-pc] pc.addTrack/removeTrack are confusing and mostly redundant. Mark as legacy? jan-ivar via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Respec errors uncovered by Respec-19 Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Define timestamps as performance.timeOrigin + performance.now() Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Lennart Grahl
• [webrtc-pc] need to clear [[AssociatedMediaStreams]] in removeTrack? Philipp Hancke via GitHub
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Toshiya Nakakura

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 February 2018 13:36:38 UTC