Re: higher level APIs (was:

Justin said:


"However, if we want to reframe the effort similar to what Youenn proposes, namely defining a protocol-agnostic NG API, and then considering QUIC as one substrate on which this API can be implemented (perhaps amongst others), that might facilitate reaching a consensus here."


[BA] Two protocol agnostic APIs have previously been discussed in the WEBRTC WG:


a. WHATWG Streams.  At the F2F meeting in Stockholm there was some enthusiasm for use of WHAT WG streams for multiple transports (e.g. SCTP data channel as well as QUIC).  At TPAC Lyon, Peter made a concrete proposal for QUIC, and Jan-Ivar discussed steps toward streams support for the SCTP data channel.  So there is a concrete proposal for a protocol-agnostic NG API on the table.  However, it's not yet clear whether WHATWG streams is the best way to address critical issues such as multi-threading or whether other approaches might offer similar benefits in a wider set of circumstances.  So one way forward is to continue to investigate approaches to multi-threading, including data transfer in workers and WHATWG streams.


b. RTCDataChannel.  As Peter noted in his presentation at TPAC Lyon, the original goal was to enable QUIC as a transport for the existing RTCDataChannel API.  The current draft of WebRTC-QUIC allows RTCDataChannel (or at least the reliable portion of it) to be built on top of it, assuming that the data channel protocol for QUIC were to be defined.  However, it's not clear how much developer enthusiasm there is for exposing QUIC via a WebSockets/RTCDatachannel API.