Re: Tracking implementation status of webrtc-pc

On 04/20/2018 08:50 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> Dom said: 
>
> "I have also noticed this reports wrong data for RTCDataChannel and filed
> a bug accordingly https://github.com/GoogleChromeLabs/confluence/issues/276"
>
> [BA] The reports also doe not take into account any interfaces provided by adapter.js. 
>
> So for example, the table indicates that Edge doesn't support RTCDTMFSender which adapter.js shims on top of "RTCDtmfSender". 

If we want to have counted cases like the adapter.js shim, I think we
need to have separate columns for "browser" and "browser + adapter".

What's the update process for this table? I note that replaceTrack from
Chrome 65 is included, but not the dtmf attribute, which landed in 66,
isn't.

-- 
Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.

Received on Saturday, 21 April 2018 10:57:43 UTC