Re: Poll: Location and nature of "V2 kickoff" WG meeting

Q1: Would you prefer to meet in north America over the proposed location
(Stockholm)? Would it make a difference regarding your possibility to
attend in person?

70%  - I'll show up in Stockholm but not in North America
20%  - I'll show up in either place
5%    - USA might not let me travel that often there. Thanks for moving
IETF to Canada.
3%    - I need to be 183 days home per year to be tax resident and there is
no meeting in Asia almost.
2%    - other visa or gov related issues.

Q2: - I prefer a physical meeting (and will come)

for the record: mentions of perceived fairness of meeting locations and
times are always "interesting" for the happy few of us living in Asia .....


On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@atos.net>
wrote:

> Would love to say I will attend in person and restart more active
> participation but not sure that will be possible given other commitments in
> June, hopefully if a physical meeting is chosen then some remote
> participation might be possible..  Attending a meeting in Stockholm is a
> bit more likely than North America but if I have to choose from the
> pre-selected answer it would be:
>
> Q1.
> I won't show up physically no matter where you hold it.
>
> Q2
> I prefer a virtual meeting, and won't show up on a physical one,
>
> Regards
> Andy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no]
> Sent: 13 April 2018 13:13
> To: public-webrtc@w3.org
> Subject: Poll: Location and nature of "V2 kickoff" WG meeting
>
> Regarding the f2f meeting in June, where a main topic would be "how do
> we get started with NV", it seems that the days of June 19-20 is the
> best selection [1].
>
> At yesterday's VI meeting it was however decided that we should
> investigate two things:
>
> Q1: Would you prefer to meet in north America over the proposed location
> (Stockholm)? Would it make a difference regarding your possibility to
> attend in person?
>
> If you answer one of the below, it will make tallying easier for us:
>
> - I'll show up in Stockholm but not in North America
> - I'll show up in North America but not in Stockholm
> - I'll show up in either place
> - I won't show up physically no matter where you hold it
>
>
> Q2: Should we instead go for a virtual meeting, e.g. using WebEx, to
> maximize participation? We think if we do this we should shorten the
> sessions to 3 - 4 hours per day since virtual meetings can be a bit more
> exhausting.
>
> If you answer one of the below, it will make tallying easier for us:
>
> - I prefer a physical meeting (and will come)
> - I prefer a virtual meeting, but will show up on a physical one
> - I prefer a virtual meeting, and won't show up on a physical one
> - I won't attend either a physical or a virtual meeting, but am
> responding anyway
>
>
> Let us know latest by Friday next week (April 20) what you think.
>
> Harald, for the chairs
>
> --
> Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
>
>
>


-- 
Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
President - CoSMo Software Consulting, Singapore
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard

   -