- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:15:57 +0100
- To: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org
On 11/28/2017 06:59 PM, Sergio Garcia Murillo wrote: > On 28/11/2017 18:42, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >> On 11/28/2017 06:32 PM, Sergio Garcia Murillo wrote: >>> Hi Harald, >>> >>> Just my two cents >> >> Please read and comment on the proposal - I think I've shown how to >> get both functionalities in the explainer, without breaking >> compatibility. > > Your proposal seems fine to me, just that I thought IMHO that the API > could be cleaner and proposed an alternative, but feel free to ignore it. > > Best regards > Sergio > Thanks, that wasn't clear to me from your message, I guess my reading skills are not good enough. Why do you think your API proposal is cleaner? It would make the "priority" dictionary member have IDL type "RTCPriorityType OR sequence<RTCPriorityType>", with the need to spec what to do in case of empty sequence, more than 2 members and so on - this seemed more complex to me. Probably matter of taste, of course. Harald
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:16:26 UTC