W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2017

Re: "pranswer" status (or get rid of it)

From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 00:40:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfn+6xoK7n=eevqKjw1K6h3_Pq5Ouzf49RcAvxwti5HRcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
2017-05-23 0:44 GMT+02:00 Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>:
> Lets say the offer in step 1 included a hardware codec for video, the question of relevance for browsers is if in step 5 the SDP did not use that hardware codec, are the resources freed so another tab or application could use the hardware codec. In step 8, if that SDP used the hardware codec, that would fail if they were freed in step 5 and used by something else.

Got your point, but I've never seen that scenario and I expect it
won't really happen in any real one. Basically because pranswer is
just "useful" in VoIP early-media.

Iñaki Baz Castillo
Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2017 22:40:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:50 UTC