- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 07:17:58 +0000
- To: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "deadbeef@google.com" <deadbeef@google.com>
- CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Hi Bernard, Cullen, Ekr and Taylor (cc group), You all committed to review the webrtc-pc document, and we encourage others to do the same (the more eyes we get reading it the better the quality will be). We’d like you to report findings in the form of github Issues at [1]. The review was triggered by the ambition to move to CR. The bar to move to CR is that the spec fulfills the technical requirements, but we would be glad to see everything you find reported (including editorial things). However, we intend to categorize the Issues; only the ones that are about technical requirements should hold off a transition to CR (the other ones we can deal with after getting to CR). Things will be simpler if you all review the same version, so please use the version at [2]. The technical requirements are listed in [3] (especially the API requirements “Axx” are in scope) and to some extent in [4]. We’re doodling [5] for a June meeting to deal with the Issues reported, so please finalize the review by May 31st. Stefan for the chairs [1] https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues [2] https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/archives/20170515/webrtc.html [3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7478 [4] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch [5] http://doodle.com/poll/x6zgi3mbuwc4qpw9
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2017 07:18:35 UTC