Re: Identity mechanism at risk?

On 3/17/17 10:20, T H Panton wrote:
> (happy to take this off list if it helps).

What would help is recognizing that "it's actually okay in the rare case 
when one of the parties is *also* the service provider" does little to 
address the vastly-more-popular case that the service provider is *not* 
a party to the conversation.

/a

Received on Friday, 17 March 2017 15:36:02 UTC