- From: Soares Chen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 03:50:30 +0000
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
soareschen has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc: == Inconsistent behaviors of addTrack compared to addTranseiver and sender.replaceTrack == - `addTrack` verifies that given track is not not found in any existing sender, and otherwise throws `InvalidAccessError`. However the same checking is not done in `addTransceiver(track)` and `sender.replaceTrack`. - `addTrack` tries to reuse existing sender that is compatible and with null track, `addTransceiver(track)` creates new transceiver regardless. - `addTrack` mentions about checking the origin of track, `addTransceiver(track)` doesn't. - Some (informational?) descriptions in `addTransceiver`, e.g. effects on creating offer and session descriptions, are not found in `addTrack`. I see quite some overlaps between `addTrack` and `addTransceiver`. Is it correct that `addTrack` is there for legacy reasons? Does it make sense to factor out the common steps and put them in a common section? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1386 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 15 June 2017 03:50:37 UTC