- From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:51:23 -0600
- To: Varun Singh <varun@callstats.io>
- Cc: Göran Eriksson AP <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Just as a stab in the dark on how to do this ... Perhaps a table that had many packet where received for each DSCP that had been received in the last second. And a separate table for sent packets. Would something like that work ? > On Jul 28, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Varun Singh <varun@callstats.io> wrote: > > This was brought up before. https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-stats/issues/133 and https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-stats/issues/135. Any ideas on how to represent this info? > On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 at 17.42, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote: > > > On Jul 15, 2017, at 6:30 AM, Göran Eriksson AP <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2017-06-18, 08:39, "Stefan Håkansson LK" > > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > > > >> the section "Priority and QoS model" [1] basically gives the JS > >> application the options "very-low", "low", "medium" and "high" and then > >> references RTCWEB-TRANSPORT section 4 and TSVWG-RTCWEB-QOS. > >> > >> RTCWEB-TRANSPORT section 4 in turn describes "local prioritization" and > >> use of DSCP (with references to TSVWG-RTCWEB-QOS for the later). > >> > >> Both "local prioritization" and DSCP use are phrased as "SHOULD". This > >> means that there may be no local prioritization and/or no DSCP marking > >> made even though a specific priority is requested, and the application > >> would not know. > > > > Having done some experiments with the some of the UA¹s, as a developer I > > would like to 1) have a feedback on whether the UA supports the setting or > > not, and 2) that the UA expose the marking set for debugging up and > > downstream. > > > > Œ1¹ would imply UA has/will applied/y the setting of the Œlocal > > prioritisation¹ and setting of DSCP upstream packets while Œ2¹ is useful > > for the purpose of debugging downstream. > > > > A UA that does not support Œ1¹ (for whatever reason not limited to OS > > capabilities) should provide such a feedback. > > > > This was my 5 cent, :-). > > 100% agree - this would be really helpful. I wonder if there is a way to put the sent and received DHCP values in stats ? > > > > > -- > Founder, CEO, callstats.io > http://www.callstats.io > > Interested in networking, media quality, and diagnostics. > We are hiring!: www.callstats.io/jobs/
Received on Friday, 28 July 2017 18:51:48 UTC