- From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:32:25 +0200
- To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 7/19/17 14:19, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > 2017-07-19 14:15 GMT+02:00 Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>: >> While I might be able to come up with a reasonable-sounding explanation here >> (and it might even be true), the top-line practical consideration here is >> that we can't really make radical changes to the API flow with so much >> deployed code. > While I 100% agree with that, I don't think that the whole WebRTC 1.0 > spec is a good example of "avoiding radical API changes" (stream based > API => track based API => transceiver based API). > I don't think this is the venue for a protracted philosophical conversation on this point, so this is probably my last message on the topic; but those were changes with substantive improvements tied to them. The pain of changing them was carefully weighed against the value of doing so. Changes along the lines of what you suggest have no real benefit beyond aesthetics. /a
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2017 12:32:56 UTC