- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 11:11:57 +0200
- To: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Le 05/04/2017 à 19:01, Bernard Aboba a écrit : > [BA] To me, it does not make sense to retain optional features with > only one implementation while removing mandatory features with only a > single implementation. > > Aside from Section 8.6 (where mandatory to implement stats are > identified), the specification rarely > calls out optional functionality. > > Can we perhaps start from the assumption that unless called out as > optional, features are mandatory to implement? +1 > If a feature only turns out to have one implementation, can we > reclassify it as optional at PR? If it was marked at risk, probably; but if not, it "just" means another CR cycle which can stay pretty short. Dom
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2017 09:12:06 UTC