W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2017

Re: WebRTC 1.0 CR exit criteria

From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 11:11:57 +0200
To: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8821a091-6bf4-3b94-2cf1-5f420ce992cb@w3.org>
Le 05/04/2017 à 19:01, Bernard Aboba a écrit :
> [BA] To me, it does not make sense to retain optional features with
> only one implementation while removing mandatory features with only a
> single implementation.
> 
> Aside from Section 8.6 (where mandatory to implement stats are
> identified), the specification rarely
> calls out optional functionality.
> 
> Can we perhaps start from the assumption that unless called out as
> optional, features are mandatory to implement?

+1

> If a feature only turns out to have one implementation, can we
> reclassify it as optional at PR?

If it was marked at risk, probably; but if not, it "just" means another
CR cycle which can stay pretty short.

Dom
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2017 09:12:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:50 UTC