Re: Rationale behind the RTCRtpTransceiver

2016-05-13 22:31 GMT+02:00 Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>:
> You are correct.  ORTC does not need an RtpTransceiver, and we's carefully
> designed the RtpTransceiver to contain all of the SDP cruft so that
> RtpSender/RtpReceiver don't.  You can think of RtpTransceiver as
> RtpSdpMediaSection, because that's kind of what it is.  When using ORTC (or,
> hopefully, WebRTC NV), you can just ignore the RtpTransceiver.

Thanks to both. Very constructive.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

Received on Friday, 13 May 2016 22:38:11 UTC