Re: Note Re:Merged Pull Request: Adds the "implementation" variable to RTCCodec. from Cullen Jennings (fluffy) on 2016-05-10 (public-webrtc@w3.org from May 2016)

From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 21:04:43 +0000
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <137EEA55-CB62-47C2-9028-7BC852115D3D@cisco.com>

> On May 10, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> 
> On 05/10/2016 10:26 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
>> Question about this ... say I was on a mobile device that hard hardware support for the codec as well as the default software implementation in the browser. Would this tell me which was being used because that is really what I need to track down problems with hardware codecs on mobile devices?
> 
> That's why we (Chrome implementors) want it!

Good to hear. That will be very useful for all kinds of things.

Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 21:12:13 UTC