Friday, 29 January 2016
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: getSenders/getReceivers: optional kind parameter
- [webrtc-pc] getSenders/getReceivers: optional kind parameter?
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Contributing source(s) missing voice activity flag
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Update build configuration
- [webrtc-pc] Closed Pull Request: Updating build configuration
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update build configuration
Thursday, 28 January 2016
- Re: Dropping SDP-specific errors
- Re: Dropping SDP-specific errors
- Re: Dropping SDP-specific errors
- Re: Dropping SDP-specific errors
- Asking developers for input on how they use ICE states.
- Re: Next Virtual Interim - February 2016
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Spelling of Rtx/FecParameters
- Dropping SDP-specific errors
- New WD of WebRTC 1.0 published
- FYI: github issue management
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update SOTD as the document is now quite stable and the group is look…
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: In Change log section fix the heading of the latest entry.
- [webrtc-pc] Signaling a=end-of-candidates
Tuesday, 26 January 2016
Monday, 25 January 2016
- RE: New webrtc-pc Editor's draft (v20160125)
- New webrtc-pc Editor's draft (v20160125)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Remove ambiguous language on changing certificates in rtcconfig
Friday, 22 January 2016
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Add contribution guidelines
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Get rid of RTCAnswerOptions?
Thursday, 21 January 2016
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Add non-normative ICE state transitions
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: SDP changes between the createOffer and setLocalDescription
- [webrtc-pc] Need to specify error when rejecting invalid SDP changes
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Parsing stun/turn URLs
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Add contributing source voice activity flag
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] How should replaceTrack() behave with an "unused" sender
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Make replaceTrack() handle "not sending yet" case (fixes: #438)
- [webrtc-pc] Clarify relation between a local track's settings and how it is encoded by PeerConnection
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Typo fixes
Wednesday, 20 January 2016
- [webrtc-pc] Spelling of RTCRtxParameters and RTCFecParameters
- Virtual Interim - feedback & next meeting
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransports needs to be DOMString not enum?
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Potentially private IP addresses revealed
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Streams that become isolated generate errors on PC
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Add drop option for RTCDegradationPreference
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Framerate knob for simulcast
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] The "consumer of the session description” conflicts with terminology in 3.
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidate's sdpMid and sdpMLineIndex members
- Re: Relation between a track's constraints/settings and how it is transmitted
- Re: Relation between a track's constraints/settings and how it is transmitted
Tuesday, 19 January 2016
- RE: Relation between a track's constraints/settings and how it is transmitted
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Typo fix
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Definition of Active for an RTCRtpReceiver
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCIceTransport.component when RTP/RTCP is in use
- Re: [video] WebRTC Virtual Interim - 14 Jan 2016
- Should we get drop RTCAnswerOptions?
- Re: [video] WebRTC Virtual Interim - 14 Jan 2016
- Re: [video] WebRTC Virtual Interim - 14 Jan 2016
- Re: [video] WebRTC Virtual Interim - 14 Jan 2016
- [video] WebRTC Virtual Interim - 14 Jan 2016
- Re: Relation between a track's constraints/settings and how it is transmitted
- Re: Relation between a track's constraints/settings and how it is transmitted
- Relation between a track's constraints/settings and how it is transmitted
Monday, 18 January 2016
- [webrtc-pc] Section 5.2.4: Definition of Active for an RTCRtpReceiver
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update error reports to align with existing DOM Errors
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Use enum for RTCDataChannel’s ordered attribute
Friday, 15 January 2016
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Reject changes to peerIdentity and certificates in setConfiguration
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Use enum for voiceActivityDetection
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Use an enum to describe directionality of RTP Stream
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Use ErrorEvent as interface for events emitted by RTCDataChannel.onerror
- [minutes] WebRTC Virtual Interim 14 Jan 2016
Thursday, 14 January 2016
- Re: New Hangouts link
- Re: New Hangouts link
- New Hangouts link
- Re: Happy New Year! Virtual Face-to-Face Agenda
- Re: Happy New Year! Virtual Face-to-Face Agenda
- Re: Happy New Year! Virtual Face-to-Face Agenda
- Re: Happy New Year! Virtual Face-to-Face Agenda
- Re: Happy New Year! Virtual Face-to-Face Agenda
Wednesday, 13 January 2016
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Re-add RTCRtpTransceiverInit.sendEncodings
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add more explicit language about transceivers, MIDs and rollbacks.
Tuesday, 12 January 2016
- PR 462 for PeerConnection.activateSender
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add PeerConnection.activeSender() and update early media example.
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] when closing, all outstanding actions are cancelled and their callbacks are fired with a "cancelled" error
- Re: Happy New Year! Virtual Face-to-Face Agenda
Monday, 11 January 2016
Friday, 8 January 2016
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Add Privacy/security review questions
- [webrtc-pc] getRemoteCertificates() behavior in "new" and "connecting" states
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] `getRemoteCertificates()` is ill-defined
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: getRemoteCertificates() behavior in "new" and "connecting" states
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add non-normative ICE state transitions
- [webrtc-pc] Closed Pull Request: Non-normative ICE state transition diagram
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Non-normative ICE state transition diagram
- [webrtc-pc] Non-normative ICE state transition diagram
Thursday, 7 January 2016
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: SDP changes between the createOffer and setLocalDescription
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Keep event handler attribute descriptions simle (don't specify when called)
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Clean up event handler attribute descriptions (fixes: #383)
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Clarify flow of SDP exchanges
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Section 10.1 (Simple Peer-to-peer Example) should explicitly handle "answer" type
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] No reference to where TypeError is defined
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Use updated reference to WebIDL-1
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: non-nullable RTCTrackEvent args means Init dict members are required.
- [webrtc-pc] Merged Pull Request: Complete security considerations based on security questionnaire and IP address discussions
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add contributing source voice activity flag
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fixes for a couple of small WebIDL bugs
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Make replaceTrack() handle "not sending yet" case
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clean up event handler attribute descriptions (fixes: #383)
- Re: Definitions and Terminology in Section 9 - IdP
Wednesday, 6 January 2016
- Definitions and Terminology in Section 9 - IdP
- Happy New Year! Virtual Face-to-Face Agenda
- [webrtc-pc] Contributing source(s) missing voice activity flag
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clarify flow of SDP exchanges
Tuesday, 5 January 2016
- [webrtc-pc] Closed Pull Request: Add languages on how to choose IP addresses.
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] should "none" be a recognized value in RTCIceTransportPolicy?
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Language for onnegotiationneeded is incomplete/inconsistent.
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Clarify component for ICETransport
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] RFC5245 says nothing about multiple TURN servers, but WebRTC can be supplied with more than one.
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Set a priori codec preferences
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Use updated reference to WebIDL-1
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add contribution guidelines to README
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: non-nullable RTCTrackEvent args means Init dict members are required.