- From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:31:40 -0500
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <56C4E6BC.2070308@jesup.org>
On 2/17/2016 3:15 PM, Peter Thatcher wrote: > If upscaling is not allowed, then I it's impossible to meet a > requirement of "must be exactly 90 pixels in height". I think this may have been mis-stated, or mis-understood. My understanding is that some applications are going to display thumbnails in a fixed-size bar, or may be sent to other things that in their layout/UI/etc have a fixed-space for it, and for those putting an upper limit on size makes a ton of sense. If the size is smaller than that - that's ok, you scale it up to the desired size *at the receiver*; you don't spend bits sending upscaled video on the wire. If for some unknown reason the receiver can't scale it up - it decodes it and shows it letterboxed/inset/whatever. I think layouts (both in-browser and in fixed-function devices) will often have a preferred thumbnail size - or will only occasionally change the preferred size. -- Randell Jesup -- rjesup a t mozilla d o t com Please please please don't email randell-ietf@jesup.org! Way too much spam
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2016 21:33:25 UTC