- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 14:26:38 -0500
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <56BCE06E.7090107@mozilla.com>
On 2/11/16 12:01 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote: > > Issue link: https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/497 > <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/497> > > The question has arisen as to whether setParameters() can change the > RID value. > > The specification allows the RID to be set in in addTransceiver() (via > init.sendEncodings), prior to calling createOffer() > So currently in Firefox Nightly, users can do this: |var sender = pc.addTrack(stream.getVideoTracks()[0], stream); sender.setParameters({ encodings: [{ rid: "A", maxBitrate: 300000 }, { rid: "B", maxBitrate: 100000 }] }); pc.createOffer().then(d => pc1.setLocalDescription(d)); | Works without having to use |addTranceiver|. Did we decide this should not work? This is perhaps a separate question from whether RIDs should be be modifiable after O/A. .: Jan-Ivar :. > This results in the setting of the RID value in the SDP produced by > createOffer(). An O/A exchange may then occur. > > However, after the O/A exchange has completed, is it then possible to > change the value of the RID in a call to setParameters() without > another O/A exchange? > > The effect of such an setParameters() call would include placement of > the modified RID value in an SDES header extension to RTP, as well as > placement in an SDES RTCP packet, as described here: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roach-avtext-rid > > Assuming that the RTCP SDES packet is not lost, the remote peer will > be informed that RTP packets including a new RID value can be expected > to arrive (or may have arrived!). > > However, without an O/A exchange, won’t the remote peer be lacking > important information needed to process RTP packets containing the new > RID (such as the constraints associated with the new RID value)? > > If this is correct, then an SDP O/A exchange is needed, and the RID > should be considered “read only” for setParameters(). >
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2016 19:27:09 UTC