- From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:17:05 +0000
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
One concern with a "living document" that never reaches a completion milestone is that the maturity of the specification may be unclear to potential implementers. Also, this may discourage development of compliance tests. -----Original Message----- From: Harald Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no] Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 7:03 AM To: public-webrtc@w3.org Subject: Comments needed - procedures for defining stats See this PR from May: https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-stats/pull/43 The proposal is to treat the stats document as a "living document" (with occasional snapshots) that serves as both the registry and the repository of definitions for stats values. Cullen has raised one counterargument - that he'd like to be able to reserve a name without finalizing the definition of the variable. (I hope I've phrased that correctly) Opinions sought. -- Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
Received on Friday, 26 August 2016 15:17:35 UTC