Re: No events fired as a result of pc.close() - OK?

On 27 April 2016 at 16:18, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK
<stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Does anyone see good reasons for changing this behavior for PeerConnection?

No.  I don't think so.  That allows people to write event handlers and
assume that the target is still active.  Otherwise, people will react
to events by calling pc.whatever() and find that it throws/rejects.

Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 06:39:48 UTC