W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > September 2015

Re: Removing syntaxerror for ice candidates

From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 17:21:27 +0000
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D3C3CDFF-BFCA-4178-99C2-2CF623697FEE@cisco.com>

> On Jul 7, 2015, at 3:03 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote:
> * there is no definition of what it means for an ICE candidate to be malformed (the RFC doesn't define such a term)

not arguing what when and how and error should be returned but ICE candidates do have a clear syntax and we can sort out the tickle ICE spec that defines this to be clear about what's valid. I do think we should get a some reasonable error somewhere if you pass garbage as the ICE candidates. ICE is hard to debug at the best of times. 
Received on Saturday, 26 September 2015 17:21:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:46 UTC