W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > September 2015

Re: RTCSessionDescription and RTCIceCandidate

From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:41:17 -0400
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <55FAFB3D.8070704@mozilla.com>
On 9/15/15 3:15 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
> On 9/15/15 2:56 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>> Is this because the dictionary definers have defined that {} (empty
>> dictionary) should be treated the same as a missing argument, and want
>> to make the possibly-missing argument explicit?

Yes, I'm pretty sure that's it. The binding code makes the dictionary 
invariant in the implementation, meaning it can't implement different 
behavior for the two (less code == less bugs).

.: Jan-Ivar :.
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2015 17:41:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:46 UTC