Re: RTCSessionDescription and RTCIceCandidate

On 11/09/2015 21:01, Martin Thomson wrote:
> ...since Dom asked, yes we would have to retain this in current
> implementations, but we might only retain the prefixed versions.

I'm afraid they aren't prefixed in Chrome; shouldn't we add the 
constructor to the dictionary, even if only for backwards comapt?

Dom

Received on Monday, 14 September 2015 04:51:37 UTC