There's a lot of important stuff in the draft that wasn't discussed at the interim call, such as the attributes/constraints an a RID and what's mandatory to implement and not and how you know what the other side supports or not. We spent so much time figuring out if we could exhaust PTs or not that we didn't have as much time for discussing some of the important details of the draft. So regardless of how long or short the current known list of issues is, there is still a lot of potential for new ones to come up as we get around to discussing the important details. On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote: > > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 4:03 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK < > stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > > > > My understanding is that RID has been added with a minimum of effort, > > and that there now are many (not yet addressed) issues that must be > > resolved. > > I don't agree with that. The total list of issues is very short. If people > are aware of other issues they should send them to the mmusic list. People > who have not read it should read the version coming out by the Monday > deadline and send issues to the list before IETF 94 so they can be > discussed. > > > >
Received on Friday, 16 October 2015 17:00:12 UTC